Denise Provost

Alderman-at-Large

133 Middlesex Avenue - Home Depot Special Permit Application


Mr. Kevin Prior, Chairman
c/o Ms. Kristin Levesque
Somerville Planning Board
93 Highland Avenue
Somerville, MA 02143

December 20, 2000


I hope that you will entertain a few quick notes in explanation of some points raised by my earlier communication to the Board.

1) As to the nature of the nonconformity of the former Assembly Square Mall structure, it clearly lacks the 20% landscaping component required in a Business Park Assembly zone by S.Z.O. sec. 8.5.D. Moreover, the ASLP will increase this non-conformity by replacing what little landscaped area there is on the site with loading docks and paved access drives within the Middlesex Avenue building setback area. There is no provision for the landscaping or screening of any of this loading area. ( See Drawing C-3, Layout and Materials Plan, submitted by ASLP with its building permit application.)

Such a plan would be in violation of S.Z.O. sec. 10.2.2. even if a nonconforming use or structure were to be lawfully continued. Where the ASLP permit application proposes "selective demolition, alteration, and re-tenanting" of the mall structure, and change of its exterior elevations, this degree of change triggers complete conformity with all the landscaping requirements of Sec. 10, at minimum. It also appears from this plan that the new Home Depot structure would itself be nonconforming, by failing to provide the full required 20' of side setback between itself and the boundary of the public right of way in Middlesex Avenue.

2) The ASLP disingenuously claims in its special permit application only to be "renovating" and "retenanting" the mall structure. ASLP's building permit application, in the quot;detailed description of proposed project" section, calls for "selective demolitions of portions of existing structure and related alterations to existing structure for continued retail uses within the existing structures which commenced in 1979-1980."

What ASLP fails to mention is that, under its plans, this "existing structure" will be as nonexistent as the "continued retail uses" which supposedly still exist within the mall. Inspection of sheets S2.0 and S2.2 of the ASLP plans, one can see that the entire mall structure from the wall of K-Mart into a third of the Building 19 will be totally demolished. A whole new foundation will be laid, supported by no fewer than 1,195 new pilings. Even if the mall represented a prior nonconforming use (and I have previously demonstrated why it does not), how can ASLP claim any rights in a prior non conforming use once it has demolished the structure that contains the use? I previously raised this point with respect to the partial demolition of the Building 19; I now realize that this question applies to the entire project. ( See also the attached "Taurus News and Trends" newsletter, which speaks of the "demolition of the mall.")

3) Closer scrutiny of the ASLP's construction plans for Home Depot raise more serious and immediate MEPA concerns than I raised generally in my remarks to this Board. Drawing C-3, referenced above, shows that ASLP plans to change completely the curb cuts and pedestrian and vehicular travel areas along Middlesex Avenue, an MDC roadway. This area, much of it directly opposite the heavily-used Somerville District Court, is now an area of landscaping and pedestrian pathway, with some curb cuts for vehicular access to doors leading to the rear of some of the commercial spaces within the mall.

ASLP's plans call for the construction of a heavy-duty lumber loading dock, two other double loading docks, and another, single loading dock for the garden center. This plan violates Sec. 9.1.c. of the S.Z.O., setting forth the reduction of hazards to pedestrians as one of the aims of the parking and loading provisions of the City's Zoning Ordinance. It renders an area presently benign for pedestrians into a working site for tractor trailers. This downgrading of use and reduction of pedestrian amenities also violates the spirit and recommendations of the Cecil Study, and of the Planning Board's own interim zoning proposal. Can we reasonably expect state approval of this plan through the MEPA process? Wouldn't we hope for a contrary ruling?

For these reasons and those previously stated, I urge this Board to deny ASLP's Special Permit for a Change of Nonconforming Use at 133 Middlesex Avenue.

Respectfully submitted,

Denise Provost

Denise Provost
Alderman-at-Large

To return to the previous page, use your browser's BACK button


This file has been converted from WordPerfect
Using wp2html.exe by Andrew Scriven